Abatify Dispatch

Climate Market Intelligence

Climate stories, collected and read each day.

Global forest rights funding grows, but direct access lags
Lead StoryPolicy
Eco-Business
Eco-Business· Oct 14

Global forest rights funding grows, but direct access lags

A report from funders of a pledge to support Indigenous peoples and local communities’ land rights found that donors delivered US$2.35 billion between 2021 and 2025, exceeding the US$1.7 billion target made at the 2021 UN Climate Change Conference by 38 per cent.

Abatify Analysis

**Surging global funding for Indigenous land tenure strengthens biospheric integrity, though direct disbursement bottlenecks threaten the operational scale of front-line LULUCF conservation.** - Securing community land tenure establishes proven ecological barriers against deforestation, directly protecting terrestrial biodiversity reservoirs and non-carbon ecosystem services. - Accelerated capital for forest tenure underpins long-term carbon sequestration across primary tropical biomes, curbing emissions leakage risks inherent to poorly policed boundaries. - Empowered Indigenous stewardship bolsters ecosystem stability, mitigating ecological degradation and non-permanence risks across vast forest and Blue Carbon buffer zones.

**The capital surplus exceeding pledges by 38% signals strong institutional will, but intermediaries' failure to provide direct community access clashes with ICVCM safeguards and transparent carbon market mechanisms.** - The disparity in direct capital access directly challenges the ICVCM Core Carbon Principle on robust social and environmental safeguards, specifically around equitable benefit-sharing mechanisms and Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC). - Structural financial channeling through multilateral intermediaries adds friction and limits localized financial liquidity, impeding the pipeline of community-originated credits intended for Article 6.2 or 6.4 ITMO authorization. - Corporates navigating SBTi Forest, Land, and Agriculture (FLAG) targets and Scope 3 mitigation face heightened reputational scrutiny if downstream interventions lack transparent, auditable flow of funds to on-the-ground rights holders.

“Stunningly short-sighted” NOAA grant cuts threaten US climate resilience
Mongabay
Forest and Ocean

“Stunningly short-sighted” NOAA grant cuts threaten US climate resilience

After Donald Trump began his second term as president of the U.S. in 2025, his administration moved to dramatically cut federal funding for agencies including the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), which administers grants for community-based projects that often focus on climate resilience. The nonprofit Grant Witness has created a database of those awards […]

·1 min read
Read →