Only one in 10 South Korean listed firms discloses nature-related risks, study finds | News | Eco-Business | Asia Pacific

Nature & Climate Perspective

**Widespread failure to report nature-related risks among KOSPI-listed companies obscures corporate impacts on global biodiversity and ecological resilience. **

• Unmonitored supply chain operations exacerbate unmitigated risks to local biodiversity, vital ecosystem services, and natural habitats.
• The absence of quantifiable reporting obscures accurate assessments of land-use change, hindering accurate LULUCF carbon sequestration tracking.
• Inadequate data on ecological dependencies threatens long-term environmental stability by constraining targeted funding for Blue Carbon and habitat restoration.

Market & Policy Outlook

**Data opacity directly conflicts with ICVCM Core Carbon Principles regarding quantitative measurement, impairing integration with SBTi and TNFD frameworks. **

• Evolving global disclosure regulations leave 90% of KOSPI firms vulnerable to policy enforcement, greenwashing litigation, and capital flight.
• Deficits in verifiable natural capital disclosures distort asset valuations and constrain financial liquidity for high-integrity nature-based credits.
• Failure to benchmark natural dependencies prevents enterprise alignment with science-based targets for Scope 3 supply chain decarbonization.