Abatify Dispatch

Climate Market Intelligence

The climate stories that matter — curated and analysed daily.

Several Key Problems with the Forest Services’ Proposed Repeal of the Roadless Area Conservation Rule
Lead StoryPolicy
Columbia Climate Law Blog
Columbia Climate Law Blog· Sep 3

Several Key Problems with the Forest Services’ Proposed Repeal of the Roadless Area Conservation Rule

On August 20, 2026, the U.S. Forest Service (USFS) published a proposal to repeal the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule (“Roadless Rule”), which prohibits new road construction, commercial timber harvests and other activities on 58.5 million acres of undeveloped public lands. As detailed in the draft environmental impact statement (DEIS) accompanying the proposed repeal, USFS […]

Abatify Analysis

**The proposed repeal of the Roadless Area Conservation Rule places 58.5 million acres of intact public forest ecosystems at immediate risk, compromising critical North American carbon sinks and high-integrity biodiversity corridors.** - Road construction and commercial timber harvesting threaten to fragment contiguous interior forest biomes, driving severe habitat loss, edge effects, and degradation of vital cold-water aquatic ecosystems. - Industrial access exposes extensive old-growth and mature standing stocks to harvest, undermining national LULUCF carbon reservoirs and reversing decades of accumulated terrestrial biogenic carbon sequestration. - The potential degradation of natural disturbance buffers elevates structural vulnerability to catastrophic wildfire and pest outbreaks, directly defying the ICVCM Core Carbon Principles (CCPs) regarding permanence and ecological integrity safeguards.

**Dismantling federal roadless protections destabilizes jurisdictional LULUCF baselines, impairs US compliance credibility, and introduces severe Scope 3 supply chain exposure for forest products under SBTi criteria.** - The regulatory shift fundamentally weakens the baseline additionality assumptions required for compliance and Article 6.4-aligned crediting mechanisms, challenging federal forestlands' eligibility for high-integrity carbon mechanisms. - Market confidence in domestic nature-based solutions is disrupted, as the loss of durable federal protection creates baseline confusion, higher buffer pool requirements, and potential pricing downgrades for neighboring carbon projects. - Corporations working under SBTi Forest, Land, and Agriculture (FLAG) guidance face increased Scope 3 deforestation and land-use-change risks within domestic timber and wood-fiber supply chains, complicating B Corp and green procurement commitments.

New Zealand Legislates Away Climate Tort, Part II: International Climate Obligations and Access to Justice
Columbia Climate Law Blog
Policy

New Zealand Legislates Away Climate Tort, Part II: International Climate Obligations and Access to Justice

This is the second of two posts examining New Zealand’s Climate Change Response (Tort Liability) Amendment Act 2026. Part I examined the legislation’s intervention in Smith v Fonterra and situated it within an emerging international backlash against corporate climate litigation. This post asks a different question: what does New Zealand’s decision to extinguish climate tort […]

·1 min read
Read →
New Zealand Legislates Away Climate Tort, Part I: Smith v Fonterra and the Global Backlash Against Climate Litigation
Columbia Climate Law Blog
Policy

New Zealand Legislates Away Climate Tort, Part I: Smith v Fonterra and the Global Backlash Against Climate Litigation

This is the second of three consecutive posts on corporate climate accountability. Yesterday’s post examined the Paris Judicial Court’s June 2026 ruling in Notre Affaire à Tous et al. v. TotalEnergies SE. On August 18, 2026, New Zealand’s Parliament enacted the Climate Change Response (Tort Liability) Amendment Act 2026 (the Liability Act), passing 67 votes to […]

·1 min read
Read →